Eddie Wizzard
On wedenesday, February 4th, our 404 english class had two very different subjects on the agenda. The professor opened up with an hour of Eddie Izzard’s awesomely hilarious stand-up, proceeded by a twenty minute lecture on the Sot-Weed Factor. I will predominately discuss Eddie’s stand-up, mainly, because it was funny.
The class I singed up for involved American rhetoric and humor, so it makes sense that I was in for a few laughs. It now becomes evident to me that in order to find things “funny,” an audience needs to find out what is not funny. How would one go about defining funny if there was no Tale of Two Cities, or Johns Grisham novels? I am pretty positive that is what Jan is trying to make evident to us; without telling us the bland truth. I am sure in some day and age, at some ancient American moment, the Sot-Weed factor was laugh out loud funny to its audience. I bet they ate it up. One thing is for sure though, they still did not think Ann Stephens was funny, that’s a fact. Anyways, the Sot-Weed read more like a history of colonial America assignment than that of a history of comedy assignment. The colonists in the 1700’s were probably starved for laughs considering they were busy enslaving Africans, growing maize, and exporting tobacco for their greedy motherland out East. They needed criticisms like the Sot-Weed factor to keep them sane, and for that, I am sorry for them. They would have been in much higher spirits if they had real comedians back then. They needed men like Eddie Izzard.
Eddie is a unique man. First, he is a transvestite. Without explanation, this gives most of the audience a common commonality that we can relate to. So if a specific joke was not the cream of his crop, you could easily just take a moment to laugh at his outfit. And second, he is one of the select people on this planet that can have an audience peeing their pants by intermission. After viewing the rest of his routine, it was evident that he is the man. Or so I think. He adopts a persona that I quickly saw through. I did not think he was any less of a men, because he dressed like a women, and as a man, disguised as a women, he still made me laugh. During the bridge between our two viewings of Izzard I was in the clouds to the purpose of his tranvestism. Was it nature or nurture?
Recently, I have seen Eddie in two motion pictures. The first was a 90’s hit, Mystery Men. He plays a sidekick disco bad guy working to fight against the men of mystery. In that role, he also adopts more of a risqué male getup, but uses very much a manly American tone. Nonetheless, he was funny. The other movie he made a funny cameo in was Ocean’s 13. In that movie, he plays a very straight engineering handyman helping the thieves in their quest to crush Willy Bank’s empire. His witty hand gestures and articulate style was the source for that comedy. Which brings me to my final argument; why a transvestite?
The answers to my questions were finally solved when he broke it down for us. First, he does not have to dress up like a woman. As seen in some of his film productions, he can be just as funny without it. He describes himself as an “action transvestite.” He makes it clear that it is his prerogative to dress like a women, and just because you dress that way, it does not make you a homosexual. That was an interesting way to put it because I thought the two always went hand in hand. Eddie made it evident that he is a straight transvestite or a male lesbian. This statement brings me to my understanding to why he dresses like a female. As a male, disguised as a female, he can fully relate to both genders; moreover, he can offend no one. Jokes that would usually be offensive to women are taken with a grain assault because of his female characteristics. But jokes that would be taken harshly by men told by a women, are disregarded because he is, in spite of everything, a man.
In conclusion, I am sorry the ancient colonists did not have an Eddie Izzard, and I am thankful I have people like Eddie Izzard in my life. Because if I didn’t, I might think the Sot-Weed Factor was funny.
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I wanted to write back on some of your comments about my “double standard aka women aren’t funny” and also to say that I agree on a few of your points about Eddie Izzard. I do not think he needs the transvestite persona. The point about being able to relate to both female and males is very insightful. I never thought about it that way and it only adds to his genius. I am also a psychology major and have taken a class on sexuality , officially names Martial Relations, Sexuality and Parenting. It is actually a widely spread lie that transvestites are homosexuals. The majority of TRUE cases of transvestites are actually heterosexual. If you are referring to drag queens; they do it fun, not because they have a sexual fetish disorder which is why it is linked to gay men and not heterosexual males. If you want to read more, I reopened my textbooks to make sure I was not misinforming people and made some more comments about transvestites, though I could never claim to be an expert on the fetish. I am sorry my argument about for why women are not funny was confusing. After reading it over again, I can definitely see why. Sometimes I go on a tangent and forget that other people have to read this and can’t read my mind. I wouldn’t want them to anyway. Thank you for your input, I did not see it as attacking but as a critique. And if your parents name you Alex (just Alex, not Alexandria, Alexa, etc), I am used to being mistaken for a male, though hopefully not in person, only on paper.
ReplyDelete1. John Grisham novels are awesome
ReplyDelete2. "anyways" is not a word
Patrick,
Good analysis on why Izzard would choose to dress like a woman on stage. Perhaps it is his intention to not offend women by dressing like one. And at the same time he is still obviously a man and his humor can still appeal to males. I would suggest to you that you try to watch some episodes of Izzard's now gone show The Riches. It aired on FX for a I think a couple of seasons a year back. He is a very versatile performer and after having known him as an actor and then watching his stand up, it made me appreciate his acting even more because he IS that good.
I might only mention that in her time, Ann Stephens was considered quite funny, as was Ebenezer Cooke--actually, what "Jan" would like you all to come away with is the fact that humor is not only one thing to all people; that it can and does change societies, and that NOTHING is funny out of context--to study humor, you need to be able to put yourself into the context of the story, sketch, video or whatever. You need to know something about the time , place and occasion. Carlin, whom most so far seem to think is not worth laughing at is actually pretty funny if you 1)don't like reality shows and 2)can put yourself into the context: all of the people in the "pyramid" are the toss-away people that the public avoids and ignores--the homeless, the terminally ill, etc. Just setting the record straight.
ReplyDelete